09 Sep The Zen of the Hubble Deep Field
Find an empty space in the sky and stare into it. Anywhere. Up there, over here, left of somewhere or right of over there, it doesn’t really matter, just pick a spot and stare, stare and stare. What you find might change the very universe. And it will almost certainly blow your mind…
In 1995 astronomers, perhaps after staring a little long at the sun, or with a few too many stars in their eyes, got the slightly left of gravitational field idea for an experiment with the Hubble Space Telescope. Let’s point the telescope at an absolutely empty patch of sky they decided, a section with less stars than the New Zealand cricket team and just about as much interest; no known galaxies, clusters, supernovas or anything else remotely capable of a spectacular explosion. Then, while perhaps listening to The Dark Side of the Moon over and over, or watching back to back screenings of Derek Jarman’s 1993 psychotropic classic Blue— 79 minutes of an unchanging plain blue screen—let’s keep it pointed there. Fall asleep, wake up, it’s still pointing at the same patch of sky. Fall asleep, wake up… the same empty blank piece of space, less than 0.005% of the night sky. Over and over for days.
Why? Because they could? The Hubble Telescope was only two years old at this point, and a bit like teenagers with newest, most powerful multi-billion dollar car in the neighbourhood, you can just imagine astronomers were chomping at the bit to put the pedal to the floor. Or in the more sedate, orderly procession of the equinoxes fashion of their profession, stare semi-excitedly at nothing for an extremely long time.
For ten days the Hubble took 342 images of the blackest black, captured photographs literally one photon at a time, often not seeing anything with its sensors for minutes on end, and at the end those photos were stitched together to reveal quite significantly more than nothing.
There were only five faint known stars in this area of the sky until the unlikely idea came along to look for something in the depths of nothing, and like magically pulling a rabbit from an empty hat, or more accurately, several million rabbits, Hubble revealed quite considerably more—considerably more and then some.
Every point of light in the image the Hubble Space Telescope captured, and the image contained thousands of them, wasn’t just a new star but a new galaxy—thousands upon thousands of new galaxies discovered. Some, to use the mind-boggling arithmetic of astronomy, were just a few million light years away; some were over ten billion light years away.
When astronomers began picking their jaws up from the floor, parked their extremely valuable car back in the garage, they learned from this one single photograph, known now as the Hubble Deep Field, that there are one hundred billion galaxies in our Universe. At least.
To attempt to put the completely incomprehensible even further beyond perspective, each of these galaxies is comparable to the home of our own Sun, the Milky Way, a galaxy which contains nearly a trillion stars. Think about this figure for a while—one hundred billions galaxies each containing a trillion stars—and you’ll be no closer to understanding than when you started, and quite possibly in need of ten days in a very quiet room.
It’s a bit zen really, and enough to make one reach for a holy book and turn to religion—staring for a long time into emptiness and eventually finding fullness; everything found in the very lap of nothing. Maybe, in deepest, darkest empty space, we can finally hear the sound of one hand clapping.
Of God’s Heart
Is Infinity’s Silence.
—Sri Chinmoy, Seventy-Seven Thousand Service-Trees, Part 11
StevePosted at 07:50h, 14 September
Why did you attempt poetry only once?
JaitraPosted at 08:04h, 14 September
Well it was “once” upon a time, rather than one time only, but the long and the short of it was that I didn’t think I was very good, so for now I am trying to stick instead to my strengths…
.-= Jaitra´s last blog ..The Zen of the Hubble Deep Field =-.
AlfPosted at 02:14h, 24 September
Good choice of poem.
In respect of Radio Astronomy, I saw on TV that they are going to build “the Square Kilometre Array. It isn’t one telescope, but rather several thousand antennas spread over 3,000 kilometres. But because they will operate as one instrument, they give coverage of the equivalent of one square kilometre and survey the heavens 10,000 times faster than anything currently operating. It will transport, process, store and recover one million million million bytes of information every day. That is equivalent to the total output of new information that humanity generates in a month.”
The price is only $3 billion before cost blowout and delays etc.
.-= Alf´s last blog ..Sound and fury =-.
JaitraPosted at 16:29h, 28 September
You’ve got to love Uncle Big Science, and $3 billion really is a trifle in the “bigger picture” of things…
AlfPosted at 21:57h, 28 September
A paltry piffle no doubt.
.-= Alf´s last blog ..Sound and fury =-.
colinPosted at 10:58h, 11 October
The immensity of one of the tiniest galaxies in one of the darkest places they could have looked is beyond our ability to comprehend.
$3 billion is indeed a paltry piffle, as is humanity.
Our own self importance in the face of infinity is quite endearing, we are like a very small dog nipping at the wheels of an impossibly huge truck that is utterly unaware of us and able to snuff us out without ever knowing it had.
JaitraPosted at 21:16h, 12 October
As a Zen master may one day say Colin, “become the impossibly huge truck.” A piffle, or possibly trite trifle, worth thinking about all the same. Thanks for stopping by.
pavitrataPosted at 21:54h, 23 October
If you meet the impossibly huge truck on the road, kill it!